Philip Glass Remixes
#1
Posted 07 August 2012 - 09:44 AM
According to the tracklist, there's only going to be one Beck mix, even though he's at the top of the list of mixers, and the one who inspired the project.
You don't know me like I know you.
#2
Posted 10 August 2012 - 09:56 PM
#4
Posted 06 October 2012 - 01:25 PM
its also on there website
http://www.nytimes.c...ework.html?_r=0
#5
Posted 06 October 2012 - 05:55 PM
Quote
GLASS: It was Arthur Russell. And he was a very good cellist. I was doing a theater piece for the Mabou Mines, it was some Beckett piece, and I wrote him a cello piece, and he liked the work and was playing it. And I came back about three months later, and I heard it and I said, “Arthur, that’s beautiful, but what happened to the piece?” And he said, “No, no, that is what you wrote,” and I said, “Arthur, it’s no longer what I wrote, it’s your piece now.” And he thought I was being upset, he apologized and I said, “No, no, no, I think we should put you down as the composer.” He had reached the point of transformation. The incremental changes had turned it into this other thing. I love the fact that he did that. And I love the fact that he didn’t know that he did it.
I was wondering how Beck might feel hearing all of the different interpretations of Song Reader, like when The Simpson's lyrics are added, etc. I guess he's really looking forward to hearing whatever happens. That guy is so open to new and different it's incredible. So many people are resistant to change and he just doesn't get stuck there somehow.
paula lala @heyheypaulala
#6
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:58 PM
i like some parts better than others. it's 20+ mins. i would guess i like 12+ mins of it or 10 idk. it's got some great parts. some slug-ish parts to. i walk and listen on my walkman/mp3 player. ive listened to it like 15 times already. when i listen i dont wanna ff or rewind to the parts i like. i try the whole thing all the time. and it's kinda hard. i like it a lot and everything dont get me wrong. and for "this" kinda music. i'll admit i dont normally go here but i would bet. this would fit it nicely and everything.
great mostly. kinda has some left over sound shapes-ish sounds in it at some parts. breifly and im not sure where but in there somewhere.
i would say this is a beck hit.
in saying that beck has been hit and miss lately.
which imo he has.
i dont wanna piss anybody off here so i wont mention where he misses at.
i will no comment on those. and thats is me being a "nice guy"
sigh. i miss all killer no filler beck.
but he is human and all after all.
and i sit the bar to high.
#7
Posted 23 October 2012 - 03:45 AM
Incidentally, I've been on a minimalism/contemporary classical obsession lately, so this remix is right on time. Reminded me why I love Beck.
#8
Posted 24 October 2012 - 09:16 PM
#9
Posted 25 October 2012 - 03:33 PM
Glass did a project centred on Cohen's book.
#10
Posted 25 October 2012 - 04:54 PM
The part right around and including" I was living in a wasteland" are definately amazing-the rest sort of felt like dull ambient or videogame music imo... I felt embarrased when my roommate came in and it was playing on my computer.
Its alot like the harry partch scrapping parts together
#11
Posted 25 October 2012 - 11:10 PM
and cut and pasted together like harry partch as well.
not that it's a bad thing. that track has great moments as well.
i think im gonna say now that ill deal with it. and look at it like a whole. even if i do think it could be trimmed up. and what would be missing, i wonder. idk maybe nothing. maybe just where one sound drags on a little longer than it should. on the other hand. i just thought of this. at least (maybe?) beck isnt editing himself. idk. then again maybe this remix was like 40 mins at first. lol. ??? idk. if so of course i give him major credit for that as well.
ah. i like it a bunch i'm just talking. plus it's a remix. he's using glass 'es music and building on top of that. that's a limit on what you can do in a way. it is very beck ish tho yes, esp sound shapes, harry, etc. btw what all did he remix here. i really wonder what the org's sound like and what all he did.
off topic: i still Love: Looking For a Sign
i have now heard blue randy a couple of times. aw. don't really do it for me. guessing it never will. again it is different from everything i talked about above. which beck does time after time. it's just him i guess. i see him recording lots of music but really only letting out what he feels is different. in meaning he could have written another 5 songs like looking for a sign let's say and of those, all same sounding, he felt that was the best one of those. and i guess the only one he felt like releasing right now. i now he makes more music than he puts out. he said that back in mv time. i would guess it hasnt changed.
just yaking on. i have nothing better to do right now.
#12
Posted 26 October 2012 - 03:58 PM
#13
Posted 26 October 2012 - 05:08 PM
#14
Posted 29 October 2012 - 07:53 PM
I agree with Dr. Freak... taking any part away from this piece would degrade it as a whole.. I think it all flows together quite nicely.
#15
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:31 PM
Daniel Star, on 29 October 2012 - 07:53 PM, said:
I agree with Dr. Freak... taking any part away from this piece would degrade it as a whole.. I think it all flows together quite nicely.
Daniel Star! Hello!
#16
Posted 03 November 2012 - 12:13 AM

Strange Invitation
Lady Astor: "If I were married to you, I'd put poison in your coffee."
Winston Churchill: "If I were married to you, I'd drink it."
#18
Posted 03 November 2012 - 11:29 AM
I can't remember who said on twitter (Max Miller?) that NYC: 73-78 was the quickest 20 minutes ever, I agree. I love the flow ~ rising and falling, Beck singing, the length of the piece. Not a big fan of the Germans & Jews part - I feel embarrassed when others are around during that part. Anyone know more info about this section?
paula lala @heyheypaulala
#19
Posted 03 November 2012 - 11:33 AM
paula lala @heyheypaulala
#20
Posted 03 November 2012 - 01:33 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















